he's not a bigot or a bad person because end of the day it's about keeping the core of spider-man, his relationship to the people of the city he protects, in a constant ying yang state, much like most of parker's dynamic with spider-man tends to be.
jonah jameson will annihilate his ass if he isn't doing the best he possibly can. spider-man's reputation is always on the line because j. when the opinion is high, the vocal minority that is jonah will be the loudest it's ever been and it keeps spider-man in line. he is directly proportional to how the public feels about spider-man at any given moment. jonah jameson's role in spider-man mythos is not to be an outright villain. it will have no real actual consequences to peter's life because we the audience know the truth and the no way home trailer sure seems to be shaping up that this whole doxxing a minor on national news really doesn't have a long-term consequence on peter because of the resources he gets as the frontrunner to being a "great man". jonah jameson's portrayal in far from home casts him as the alex jones of the mcu because it's just an extension of that. the thesis somehow is not that these rights shouldn't be displaced to anyone or an group that can make more executive decisions on how they're used, peter parker is the next "great man" in a long line of complicated "great men" that can really do no wrong as long as they're in charge and the people that oppose them are actually just evil and don't have points to make.
The edith plotline is the dumbest fucking thing the mcu has ever done which essentially putting the right to do drone strikes as the main mcguffin of a motion picture and the thesis the film comes up with is that it's only good in the hands of a 17 year old kid who was trained by a "good" billionaire tony stark and that if it goes into the wrong hands like someone who was wronged by said "good" billionaire its bad.